Tuesday 5 February 2013

The Quick Fix

This past Monday it was revealed that Europol – not purveyors of brooding, angular indie rock, but rather European Union law enforcers par excellence – have been picking through the rotten bones of over six hundred professional football matches across the globe whose outcomes, it is believed, were fixed. The headline domestically is that a Champions League game played on these shores in “the last three or four years” is among them, as well as several World Cup and European Championship qualifiers and a selection of top-flight European league fixtures. Depressing reading for anyone hoping that high profile, top flight match-fixing cases of recent years were behind us, as the depth and breadth of these revelations appear to reveal a systematic, structured and skilled web of financial misdeeds. “It would be naïve and complacent of those in the UK to think such a criminal conspiracy does not involve the English game”, stated Europol director Rob Wainwright with all the warmth and compassion of a stairwell kneecapping. Not that I'm blaming him – he's only doing his job, and right now it's one nobody amongst us envies in the slightest.

What we really need in such a dark moment is something to cheer us up, and so before football takes itself out to the garage one final time with a draft excluder and a length of hose, we should remember that this Wednesday sees one of those rare occasions which one feels should embody everything that is pure and good about football. That's right, it's England versus Brazil and breathe, because everything will be OK. Or will it?

For as long as I've been aware of the sport's very existence, Brazil have been football's omnipotent deity. Fire up any football console game from the early-to-mid nineties and the best team was always Brazil, despite being in the midst of a real-life slump. Much like Real Madrid when it comes to the European Cup, Brazil have only topped up their trophy haul in the fairly recent past, but even when times were tough their reputation remained intact, their status as football's glorious overlords undiminished with the passing years. The likes of Germany, Italy and Argentina may have conquered the world in the meantime, producing players of inscrutable genius along the way, but they never quite usurped Brazil from it's throne.

Like Australia with cricket or America with all those sports the rest of the world only pretends to care about, Brazil remains to this day global shorthand for footballing superiority. Ask the first stranger you meet who claims to neither know nor care about football, and they will still be able to tell you two things – that all footballers are preening, overpaid man-children, and that Brazil are the best in the world. Even when they aren't the best, they sort of still are, if you see what I mean. At times it feels almost de rigueur to wax lyrical about Brazilians.

All of which brings me to a terrible dark secret I'd like to share, which is that when it comes to Brazil I've always been left with a sense of, if not disappointment, then certainly anticlimax. Despite winning more World Cups in my lifetime than anyone else, I can't shake the sensation that the reality of contemporary Brazilian national teams falls some way short of what I expect them to be. I'm keen to turn this situation around, but to do so I should really go back to the start, so allow me if you will to indulge in some personal footballing therapy. I won't be charging for the session.

The summer of 1994 was my first real experience of Brazil as a footballing powerhouse, emerging from the thermometer-bursting heat of USA '94 triumphant thanks to a team favouring function over fireworks, constructed around the pragmatic but hardly mouth-watering defensive ideology of coach Carlos Alberto Parreira. Chief schemer Rai began the tournament as captain, but after scoring in their opening game, his prominence in proceedings drifted, finishing the tournament as an unused substitute having played only bit-part roles during the knock-out stages. In his absence the midfield remained a largely flair-less affair, dominated by Dunga and Mauro Silva, fine practitioners of their chosen fields, accomplished disruptors and constructors, but hardly names to set my youthful heart a-flutter. It was the front two that really got people talking – in a time of celebrated strike partnerships the pairing of Romario and Bebeto stood out as a sort of exotic Shearer and Sutton, replacing knock-downs with one-twos and basic hands-aloft celebrations with tightly choreographed post-goal paeans to newborn future-heroes. But that wasn't enough for me. That summer I fell in love with Baggio, Stoichkov and Hagi but not with Brazil.

1998 was much the same, although the attacking talent was far superior. Boasting Rivaldo's merciless bow-legged conjury, Roberto Carlos' thunderous tree-thighed wing charges, and of course the mercurial goal snaffling of the Original Ronaldo, this side had the tools and the talent but something never quite clicked for me. Their play felt intrinsically mechanical; a modern day blockbuster reboot of a cult classic, a strangely sexless scene-for-screen remake of something glorious and hallowed and lost. As a fourteen year old I remember racing home from school to catch Brazil in the opening game of France 98: a classic David & Goliath face-off between 'plucky' Scotland and these quick-limbed alien maestros. I've always found myself cheering for the underdog, but even as I leapt with delight as John Collins stroked home his equalising penalty, something deep within me still yearned for this Brazil team to ignite, to ascend to the footballing heavens in a blaze of warm light and dazzling step-overs, to hand out a lesson of pure sporting brilliance so epoch-defining it would echo through the deserted hallways of time long after I hoped off this mortal coil. Scotland's eventual undoing was a Tom Boyd own goal. With the greatest of respect, it was tangibly unsatisfying to see Ronaldo, Rivaldo et al put manfully in their place by Colin Calderwood and Darren Jackson.

In fairness they hit their stride eventually, but having reached their second consecutive final, it all went a bit wonky in Paris. Something murky and unpretty – something distinctly chaotic and abrasive – unstitched the mental fabric of that side on the eve of their big moment, allowing a Zidane-inspired French team who had steadily been gaining traction over the tournament's course to steamroller their way to victory, elating the natives and ushering in the modern era of muscular, all-action football-athletes: the age of Vieira and Henry, the remorseless, custom-built supermachines that have strode before us from that day forth. Four years later Brazil would emerge victorious in Yokohama, dually aided by the loose-limbed elastic impudence of Ronaldinho and the holder's mental implosion, but since then they haven't got further than the quarter-finals. Now ranked 18th in the world (behind Switzerland, Ecuador and Greece), even by Fifa's dodgy arithmetic they're struggling to be heard above the din.

I'm doing my best to not sell recent Brazil sides short, for they have produced some fine performances and a host of marvellously talented individuals. And yet it is the images I'd seen of Brazil sides of yore – the scratchy newsreel footage of Pele, Jairzinho and Carlos Alberto weaving hitherto unknown patterns; finding new angles of attack, coining fresh, elaborate entries in football's ballooning lexicon seemingly on the hoof – which left the young football fantasist in me feeling left out, like I'd turned up late for a great party. Despite the victories, despite the physics-defying set-pieces (this one, not this one), something felt amiss. Try as I did to move past it, the fact remained: this was not the Brazil I had been promised.

Bless us, we try our hardest to reignite that awe-struck spirit, but it always feels like we're faking it a bit, giving off a vaguely unpalatable sense of trying to reanimate a dead legend. Tournaments, clean-shirted studio anchors inform us, only really begin “tomorrow, when the Brazilians come to town”. We expect a trouncing; an exhibition of ancient ball-magic by a band of beatific pint-sized soccer nymphs. When they do arrive – not via hoverboard or spaceship or unicorn, but rather the humble coach – what we get is a rather limp, beige 2-0 victory, courtesy of a penalty and a header following an admittedly well-rehearsed corner routine (probably). Not that this will discourage us, for the action will inevitably be soundtracked by lustful commentary box gasps of “samba time!” as Gilberto Silva completes a routine five yard pass. It all feels a little like a faint-headed hen crowd chucking underwear at a Take That tribute act, the unsaid truth being that maybe we are trying a bit too hard to recapture something that just isn't there any more.

Or maybe I'm being a bit harsh. The very same criticisms I've aimed here could hold equally true of both Holland and Argentina, nations which produced great sides of yesteryear but who – despite the presence of some exceptionally gifted players (think Batistuta and Messi, Bergkamp and Sneijder) – have yet to produce a side to define the current era. Perhaps, tempting though it is, ages and generations shouldn't be compared, because the contrasts will somehow always show through clearer than the similarities, a state of affairs that can only, inescapably lead to dissatisfaction.

I hope I don't sound ungrateful or spoiled saying all this, because despite everything when I settle down to watch Brazil take to the field it's always with wide eyes and a butterfly stomach. When I pull up a pew my intention is still to worship and, as mentioned earlier, football has bigger things to worry about than living up to my dizzy expectations. So tomorrow I plan to enjoy a Brazilian side preparing to host it's first World Cup in more than six decades, and I'll look on with that same anxious hope I always have, perhaps even comforted somehow by two things: the knowledge that the reality of what I'll be watching may never quite match up with the legend, and the acceptance that maybe that's the point of legends in the first place. Let's just hope no-one knows the score already.